Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id AAA04665 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:01:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzupf29098; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:48:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA16666; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:49:13 -0500
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 23:49:13 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30D4123C.580B@cats.ucsc.edu>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Adam Chrystie <adamchry@cats.ucsc.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Adam eats his Ascii
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
jeric@accessone.com wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 1995, Adam Ives Chrystie <adamchry@cats.ucsc.edu> wrote:
> >Evidently the point order is rearranged after tripling..which is kinda a bad
> >feture..is there a way that a new version of LW can work around this?? Just
> >in case a bonehead like myself forgets to triple before making the target
> >objects????
Oppaaa...I was wront about that!! IT DOES NOT REORDER POINT ORDERS...I was tring